tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8332466.post116363874169183378..comments2023-08-08T09:38:55.103-04:00Comments on [M]etabrain[E]ntry[L]og: Learning journals and peer commentaryMelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15598380941676945491noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8332466.post-65705888367102081082007-01-12T07:45:00.000-05:002007-01-12T07:45:00.000-05:00Hi,
If you are intersting in writing your equatio...Hi, <br />If you are intersting in writing your equation by using LaTeX on your blog and then compile them... Have a look to that ;-)<br /><a href="http://servalx02.blogspot.com">http://servalx02.blogspot.com</a><br />Enjoy ;-)Wolverinehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05907782556406556721noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8332466.post-1163713219629670892006-11-16T16:40:00.000-05:002006-11-16T16:40:00.000-05:00That's a pretty big "if," though. I'm probably get...That's a pretty big "if," though. I'm probably getting overly enamoured with the "omg google documents edit from ANYWHERE!" web 2.0 fever.<BR/><BR/>Actually, the diff/merge-comments is a good point. I've been growing increasingly fond of SVN as a way of managing normal ol' papers and text/other files (not just code)... <BR/><BR/>I know the new version of OS X has some sort of SVN-ish "time-rollback" feature, but otherwise I haven't seen a whole lot of the tools programmers use (specifically: versioning, concurrent editing, checkouts, merging) translate into "normal people" usage. Seems like a lot of it would be handy.Melhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15598380941676945491noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8332466.post-1163713004793399562006-11-16T16:36:00.000-05:002006-11-16T16:36:00.000-05:00Adobe Acrobat also has a fairly robust comment/rev...Adobe Acrobat also has a fairly robust comment/revision system built in if your reviewers have access to both Acrobat and a network share.<BR/><BR/>There really ought to be some way to merge comments from different revisions of an Acrobat document; that's such a huge limitation that there must be one.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8332466.post-1163671365151574882006-11-16T05:02:00.000-05:002006-11-16T05:02:00.000-05:00Very cool, and definitely a lot closer. It looks l...Very cool, and definitely a lot closer. It looks like you can still only comment on pre-set chunks (paragraphs), though, instead of the explicit start/end spots that Peer Review would have. <BR/><BR/>The potential benefit I see is for future revisions - if you can tag text replacement suggestions to specific start/stop locations in the body, you can quickly go through and do an accept/reject of changes for the next version instead of manually editing.<BR/><BR/>That having been said, the Django Book's comments system is definitely easier to implement... and already done. Extra shininess doesn't always warrant extra technical overhead.<BR/><BR/>Thanks for the pointer!Melhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15598380941676945491noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8332466.post-1163651787217512592006-11-15T23:36:00.000-05:002006-11-15T23:36:00.000-05:00What do you think of the comments system in the Dj...What do you think of the comments system in <A HREF="http://www.djangobook.com/en/beta/chapter01/" REL="nofollow">the Django Book</A>? It's apparently based on <A HREF="http://www.jackslocum.com/yui/2006/10/09/my-wordpress-comments-system-built-with-yahoo-ui-and-yahooext/" REL="nofollow">this WordPress extension</A>.Rolandhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10879184150068693131noreply@blogger.com